Facebook and Twitter stop people sharing Joe Biden Ukraine story

Trump brands Facebook and Twitter ‘terrible’ as Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany’s account is locked for sharing article about Joe Biden’s son that was blocked until it is vetted by its third party of so-called ‘fact-checkers’

  • Twitter locked the personal account of White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany on Wednesday evening
  • She had shared  the NY Post story which claims Joe Biden met with Ukrainian businessman Vadym Pozharskyi
  • Facebook and Twitter said on Wednesday it is ‘reducing circulation’ of the NY Post story  
  • Months after the alleged meeting, Biden – who was VP at the time- pressured Ukrainian officials to fire a prosecutor who was investigating Pozharskyi
  • Trump hit out at the social media giants actions in a tweet
  • If true, it represents a huge conflict of interest and possible law break, given Biden’s son Hunter was being paid $50,000-a-month by Pozharskyi’s firm 
  • The Post published its story on Wednesday with screenshots of the emails
  • Biden’s campaign afterwards said the meeting never took place and that he has never been 

Twitter locked the personal account of White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany on Wednesday evening due to a tweet referencing claims Joe Biden met his son Hunter’s Ukrainian partners while he was Vice President. 

It came as President Donald Trump hit out at Twitter and Facebook for ‘reducing circulation’ of the New York Post article that earlier that day published alleged details about the meeting. 

The Post story says that the former Vice President met with Ukrainian businessman Vadym Pozharskyi months before Biden would pressure Ukrainian officials to fire a prosecutor who was investigating Pozharskyi’s firm.  

The social media giants were accused of ‘election interference’ for throttling the news story, after they claimed it needed to be independently verified by fact-checkers before it could be shared on their platforms. 

‘So terrible that Facebook and Twitter took down the story of “Smoking Gun” emails related to Sleepy Joe Biden and his son, Hunter, in the @NYPost,’ Trump tweeted Wednesday evening.  

‘It is only the beginning for them. There is nothing worse than a corrupt politician. REPEAL SECTION 230!’ he added, referencing the Communications Decency Act.  

Donald Trump called Facebook and Twitter 'terrible' on Wednesday evening for 'reducing circulation' of the New York Post article that claimed Joe Biden met his son Hunter's Ukrainian partners while he was Vice President, saying the story needed to be fact-checked

Donald Trump called Facebook and Twitter 'terrible' on Wednesday evening for 'reducing circulation' of the New York Post article that claimed Joe Biden met his son Hunter's Ukrainian partners while he was Vice President, saying the story needed to be fact-checked

Donald Trump called Facebook and Twitter ‘terrible’ on Wednesday evening for ‘reducing circulation’ of the New York Post article that claimed Joe Biden met his son Hunter’s Ukrainian partners while he was Vice President, saying the story needed to be fact-checked

It came just before White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany's personal Twitter account was locked for sharing the New York Post article earlier on Wednesday

It came just before White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany's personal Twitter account was locked for sharing the New York Post article earlier on Wednesday

It came just before White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany’s personal Twitter account was locked for sharing the New York Post article earlier on Wednesday

Hunter and Joe Biden. The Post story suggests that Joe, while VP, had a meeting with a Ukrainian businessman after being introduced to him by Hunter, eight months before pressuring Ukrainian officials to fire a prosecutor who was investigating the businessman

Hunter and Joe Biden. The Post story suggests that Joe, while VP, had a meeting with a Ukrainian businessman after being introduced to him by Hunter, eight months before pressuring Ukrainian officials to fire a prosecutor who was investigating the businessman

Hunter and Joe Biden. The Post story suggests that Joe, while VP, had a meeting with a Ukrainian businessman after being introduced to him by Hunter, eight months before pressuring Ukrainian officials to fire a prosecutor who was investigating the businessman

Less than an hour later, reports emerged that McEnany’s account had been locked because of the restrictions on sharing the article. 

WHAT IS SECTION 230 OF THE COMMUNICATIONS DECENCY ACT

Under the U.S. law, internet companies are generally exempt from liability for the material users post on their networks. 

Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act – itself part of a broader telecom law – provides a legal ‘safe harbor’ for internet companies.

THE TEXT: ‘No provider or user of an interactive computer service shall be treated as the publisher or speaker of any information provided by another information content provider’

WHAT IT MEANS: Social media platforms are not held legally liable for what their users post, and instead are considered an outlet where people can post whatever they want – within the guidelines of their terms of service

Advertisement

She used her government press secretary account to respond and accused the social media platform of censorship. 

‘Censorship should be condemned!’ she wrote. ‘cc: @Twitter & Facebook NOT the American way.’

On Wednesday evening, her personal account still featured a retweet of a separate Post article referencing the original story yet there was also a note at on the page stating that a previous tweet was no longer available. 

According to screenshots shared to Twitter, McEnany received a message to say a tweet violated Twitter’s rules.  

Both McEnany’s personal account and her account as WH Press Secretary could still be viewed as of Wednesday night.  

The New York Post story suggests that Biden met with Ukrainian businessman Vadym Pozharskyi in 2015, when Hunter was working for Pozharskyi’s gas firm. Months later, Biden pressured Ukrainian officials into firing a prosecutor who was looking in to the firm. 

If true, it raises serious questions of whether or not Biden abused his power as Vice President. 

Facebook, however, has decided to ‘reduce distribution’ of the article until it has been verified by its own, third-party ‘fact checkers’. 

It didn’t say why it was taking the unusual step. 

Later, Twitter users reported being unable to share links to the story online. 

Now, conservatives are accusing big tech of interfering in the election and trying to protect Biden by ‘censoring’ the story while allowing unflattering stories about Trump to spread like wildfire. 

One New York Post editor called it a ‘digital civil war’ and others asked why the sites hadn’t taken the same tough line on anti-Trump stories, like The New York Times’ piece on his $750 tax returns.

The Post published an online editorial on Wednesday afternoon. It read in part: ‘Censor first, ask questions later: It’s an outrageous attitude for one of the most powerful platforms in the United States to take.’ 

Twitter has now also stopped users from sharing the story about Biden in a move that conservatives and the media are calling censorship and election interference

Twitter has now also stopped users from sharing the story about Biden in a move that conservatives and the media are calling censorship and election interference

Twitter has now also stopped users from sharing the story about Biden in a move that conservatives and the media are calling censorship and election interference 

Andy Stone, who is a policy communications director at Facebook announced the decision on Twitter on Wednesday

Andy Stone, who is a policy communications director at Facebook announced the decision on Twitter on Wednesday

Andy Stone, who is a policy communications director at Facebook announced the decision on Twitter on Wednesday 

‘No one is disputing the veracity of The Post’s story — not even Hunter Biden.

‘His lawyer George R. Mesires wouldn’t deign to comment on the reporting, simply attacking the messenger. 

‘The Biden campaign did the same, dismissing it all as “discredited,” while saying that no meeting showed up on Joe Biden’s official schedule on those dates (well if it wasn’t “official,” guess it didn’t happen).

‘Yet Facebook is deliberately trying to keep its users from reading and deciding for themselves what it means.

‘This, when it did nothing to restrict access to the recent New York Times story on President Trump’s tax returns. And the Times didn’t say a word about how it obtained that confidential personal data,’ the Post’s piece read.

Andy Stone, who is a policy communications director at Facebook announced the decision on Twitter.

‘While I will intentionally not link to the New York Post, I want be clear that this story is eligible to be fact checked by Facebook’s third-party fact checking partners. In the meantime, we are reducing its distribution on our platform,’ he said. 

Donald Jr. was among the first to criticize it but others, including Republican Senator Josh Hawley, are now demanding answers from Facebook. 

‘Are you kidding me? After all the lies that they pushed about us and Russia collusion for years… now there’s credible evidence against the Bidens and they eliminated on their platform? 

‘Give me a break big tech has way too much power and it needs to be stopped? 

‘Joe said he never met these people and here’s an email refuting then why don’t they actually fat check in rather than just taking it off their platform. 

‘They know it will hurt Biden so they will do what they can to cover it up, that’s what they do,’ he fumed. 

In an open letter to Facebook, Sen. Hawley said: ‘It has come to my attention that this news report—one clearly relevant to the public interest—has been censored on Facebook. 

‘The seemingly selective nature of this public intervention suggests partiality on the part of Facebook. 

 ‘Censor first, ask questions later: It’s an outrageous attitude for one of the most powerful platforms in the United States to take.
The New York Post’s Editorial Board 

‘And your efforts to suppress the distribution of content revealing potentially unethical activity by a candidate for president raises a number of additional questions, to which I expect responses immediately.’ 

In its editorial, the Post said: ‘So much for Facebook’s claims to be a neutral platform: One of its top execs just put the social-media giant firmly in the pro-Biden camp.  

‘Andy Stone, the social-media company’s policy communications manager, boasted about burying The Post’s story on proof that Hunter Biden merchandized access to his dad.

‘Censor first, ask questions later: It’s an outrageous attitude for one of the most powerful platforms in the United States to take.

‘Especially when Stone wears his own bias on his sleeve: The quick biography he posts on Twitter shows his long history of working for Democrats, including lefty then-Sen. Barbara Boxer and the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee.’  

Facebook has been accused of election interference for making the decision

Facebook has been accused of election interference for making the decision

Facebook has been accused of election interference for making the decision 

Others accused Facebook of protecting Biden, the Democratic Presidential Candidate, while allowing unflattering stories about President Trump to spread. 

Conservative media outlet The Federalist said the company was now ‘officially censoring’ the Post. 

Facebook has not responded to inquiries about why it has reason to doubt the story or squash it.  

WHO ARE FACEBOOK’S FACT-CHECKERS

Facebook ‘partners’ with more than 30 fact checking organizations but nowhere does it provide a list of who they are or what their political leanings are.  

All it says is that they belong to the International Fact-Checking Network. 

Among them is The Daily Caller – a right-wing outlet. Snopes had been working with them but ended their partnership in 2019.  

They are tasked with returning a decision on whether or not a piece of content or article is truthful. 

After that, the company can still decide to overrule their decision and has in the past, notably in favor of outspoken Conservatives in an apparent effort not to appear as though they are favoring the Left.  

Advertisement

It is also unclear what the extent of the circulation reduction is.   

The New York Post is historically Conservative and the source for the story was Rudy Giuliani, one of President Trump’s closest aides. 

He gave the Post a trove of emails in which Ukrainian businessman Vadym Pozharskyi thanked Hunter for introducing him to his father, then the Vice President. 

Within months of the 2015 meeting that Pozharskyi refers to in the emails, Biden had successfully pressured Ukrainian officials to fire a prosecutor who was looking into Pozharskyi’s business.  

At the time, Hunter was being paid $50,000-a-month by Pozharskyi’s gas firm to act as a consultant, despite the fact he’d had no experience working in the gas industry.

After the Post story emerged on Wednesday, the Biden campaign said he had never met Vadym Pozharskyi.  

Biden has repeatedly insisted he was never influenced by Hunter’s dealings with Ukraine when he was Vice President. 

The emails were taken from a damaged laptop which was left, mysteriously, in a Delaware tech repair shop. 

It had a Beau Biden Foundation sticker on it and the person who dropped it off – who has not been identified – never collected it again. 

The store owner looked through the computer’s hard drive and not only found the emails but also found a video of Hunter Biden, a self-confessed drug addict, smoking crack while engaging in a sex act. 

After Facebook’s announcement on Wednesday, many asked if the company – which is notoriously left-leaning – would have applied the same type of scrutiny to the New York Times or any other Democrat-friendly media outlets. 

Earlier this year, when the Times published an expose about Trump only paying $750 in federal income tax for two years, the story spread like wildfire on social media. 

Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg routinely resists sharing his political leanings. 

In recent years, he has been attacked on both sides of the aisle for occupying too much of the tech industry and market while resisting oversight boards.  

Advertisement

Loading

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow by Email
Pinterest
LinkedIn
Share