Bulb boss is STILL being paid £250,000-a-year salary despite company receiving government bailout

Boss of collapsed energy firm Bulb is STILL being paid the £250,000-a-year salary he received before it went bust despite company receiving £1.7billion government bailout

The energy firm which launched in 2015 was placed into special administrationHayden Wood was asked by administrators to stay on in role as chief executiveBulb was bailed out last year and ministers set aside £1.7billion to run the firm This was until a buyer was found but Mr Wood refused to say if that was imminent

<!–

<!–

<!–<!–

<!–

(function (src, d, tag){
var s = d.createElement(tag), prev = d.getElementsByTagName(tag)[0];
s.src = src;
prev.parentNode.insertBefore(s, prev);
}(“https://www.dailymail.co.uk/static/gunther/1.17.0/async_bundle–.js”, document, “script”));
<!–

DM.loadCSS(“https://www.dailymail.co.uk/static/gunther/gunther-2159/video_bundle–.css”);

<!–

The boss of the collapsed energy firm Bulb is still being paid his £250,000 a year salary despite the company being bailed out by the government when it went bust.  

Hayden Wood, who set up the company, was asked by administrators to stay on in his role as chief executive after it failed in November, and continues to receive nearly £21,000 a month.

Bulb was bailed out by the Government last year and ministers set aside £1.7 billion to cover the normal running of the firm until a buyer could be found. The government had hoped the business would have been purchased by the end of the tax year in April 2022.

When quizzed by MPs on the future of the company, Mr Wood refused to say whether a buyer was imminent. It is unlikely the firm will be purchased by a private buyer, meaning taxpayers will levy the bill over the next few years.

Speaking to the Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy Committee, Mr Wood said: ‘I don’t think it responsible for me to share details of an active sales process that is ongoing right now in a public forum.’

Mr Wood said he is still receiving his salary, but has never been able to get a bonus from Bulb and had put all his personal savings into the company. He told MPs he was ‘very sorry’ the company collapsed under rising wholesale gas prices.

Bulb, which promised to make ‘energy simpler, cheaper, greener’, had around 1.6 million customers on its books when it collapsed last year.

Hayden Wood, the chief executive of energy firm Bulb, is still being paid his £250,000 a year salary despite the company being bailed out by the government when it went bust

Mr Wood said: ‘The energy crisis of last year was, I think everyone agrees, unprecedented and unfortunately led to the company failing.

‘Up until the autumn of last year we had been running those models, we had not seen a significant risk.

 ‘With the benefit of hindsight what we would have done is begin fundraising conversations sooner.’ This would have let his company hedge for customer use.

He added: ‘I am very sorry for the way things turned out with Bulb.

‘I think I and we at Bulb should take responsibility for how the business failed.’ 

Mr Wood said he and the administrators were doing everything they could to complete the sale of the business to ‘minimise the cost to taxpayers’ who are paying his salary and also to ‘minimise the disruption to consumers’.

In September, the chief executive tweeted his agreement with a statement that said while there were real issues in the energy industry, the idea of a ‘crisis’ was being pumped up by the former Big Six energy suppliers.

When Bulb collapsed it had around 1.6 million customers on its books, meaning it was too big for the Government to allow it to go through the normal process that suppliers enter when they fail. 

Taxpayer cash has been used to prop-up the firm with the company continuing to supply its customers and protecting their credit balances. 

When Bulb Energy (pictured) collapsed in November 2021 it had around 1.6 million customers on its books

Avro Energy, with 580,000 customers, was the largest supplier to fail which went through the normal process.

Its chief executive, Jake Brown, said the business paid a £250,000-a-month fee to a management company that he part-owns, and that was how Avro paid for his services and the work of six other senior managers.

However he admitted that he did not run Avro on a full-time basis, but worked for a number of firms through the management company.

When quizzed by MPs, Mr Brown repeatedly declined to name the other managers that worked for Avro, and gave little detail on their past experience before working for the company.

He eventually said that his father had been financial director, working for Avro through the management company that they owned together.

He said the business had not hedged as much as it could have because bosses believed the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline from Russia would come online and push down prices.

That would have left Avro with large costs if it had bought energy in advance.

The pipeline was completed in September last year, the same month that Avro collapsed, but has not yet come online due to the Russian war in Ukraine.

What happened and how it affected Bulb customers? 

What happened to Bulb?

The company was selling gas and electricity for less than it costs to buy. That was because the Government’s price cap limited what suppliers could charge to under the wholesale price of energy. The firm’s investors and lenders refused to continue supporting those losses, forcing it to shut down. The cap offered some protection for householders when wholesale prices surged, but it meant that the energy firm was running up massive losses.

What happened next?

Industry regulator Ofgem normally appoints a rival energy firm to take on Bulb’s 1.7million customers under a regime known as the Supplier of Last Resort. In this case, there was no chance of doing so, at least in the short term, because no other firm was prepared to take on the costs and huge losses involved. A team of special administrators was brought in to run the company and buy and sell energy until another firm in the sector was willing to take on the customers.

How it affected customers?

There was no risk to the supply of gas and electricity or any loss of credit that households had on their account. Customers would typically have been paying around £900 a year. Under the new regime, this figure was due to rise to the official price cap of £1,277 and reviewed this month. 

Who will cover the losses in administration?

The most likely outcome is the losses will be passed on to all households through a levy on every bill applied over the next few years. 

Advertisement

Advertisement

Loading

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Follow by Email
Pinterest
LinkedIn
Share